Re: Re: Would like to take over Cache Lite

On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Markus Tacker <m@tacker.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Ed Shirey <elswaretech@gmail.com> wrote: >> and also I'd >> like to propose adding memcached support to Cache Lite so it's use is >> transparent for existing Cache Lite users (with a config option, of >> course). > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Helgi Þormar Þorbjörnsson > <helgith@gmail.com> wrote: >> I would just like to point out that Cache_Lite was designed to do FS >> caching - At a quick look introducing a memcache container, hence >> driver architecture kinda breaks the idea of Cache_*Lite* :-) >> >> Maybe it's just me with these worries. > > No, I think that the best place for a memcached implemetation is Cache [1], too. Cache is kinda .. dead I think - And most people i know think it has a weird design :-) Perhaps a new package is in order, Cache_Lite_Memcache that is API compatible or even just a new package with completely new design and approach to things. Perhaps Cache2 can be started ? Just thinking out loud now. - Helgi