Re: [PEPr] Comment on Database::Mongo

On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Joe Stump <joe@joestump.net> wrote: > > On Mar 23, 2009, at 10:50 AM, till wrote: > >> Additionally -- until a package hits 1.0.0. (= stable), API breaks are >> allowed and BC doesn't have to be honoured. > > True, but starting out with a class name / directory structure that's flat > out against coding standards would be bad form and shouldn't be > accepted/allowed. > > I like Michael's approach best. Move official development to the PEAR > package while supporting the old one. You could even release a new version > of the old one that decorates the PEAR package. > > --Joe > Easy, I wasn't suggesting that it is ok to release this code when the most fundamental CS is not followed.. I was instead saying that changing the names of the classes -- if the code is not "pronounced" stable -- is not a big deal. I'll work on my email-fu. ;-) Till Till