Re: candidates for PEAR Group: why should we vote for you? Tell us your plans and your history
| From: | Dmitri Snytkine | Date: | Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:22:30 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: candidates for PEAR Group: why should we vote for you? Tell us your plans and your history | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-52000@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Does the pear president get paid? If not, then what are the benefits for
being pear president? Is it just a bragging rights?
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Greg Beaver <greg@chiaraquartet.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As we near the next election for PEAR Group and President, I'd like to
> ask all of the candidates to provide us with a brief history of their
> contributions to PEAR, and why we should vote for you. This year, the
> content of what has happened is more important than in previous years
> because Pyrus and PEAR2 will be happening as a reality in the next
> couple of weeks.
>
> In addition, I feel it is only appropriate that the existing PEAR Group
> members and PEAR president who are running for re-election provide a
> more thorough accounting of what they have been doing in the past year.
>
> The existing PEAR Group has been unable to formulate a complete coding
> standard for PEAR2 (the first draft was approved and put in the manual
> on Dec. 24, 2007, and expired on March 1, 2008, and was never renewed).
>
> In fact, a small subset of developers from the PEAR Group have taken the
> step of discussing standards with outside projects and representing PEAR
> as a project without first announcing what the new coding standards
> would look like to pear-dev, or putting anything in the manual. If my
> wording sounds harsh, it is intended to be so only as a call to action
> and accountability for our elected leaders.
>
> We, the developer who will actually have to use these standards have at
> the very least a passing interest in what they will be before they are
> set in stone. The mailing list at
> http://news.php.net/php.standards
> catalogs some of the back-and-forth regarding the standards, and
> actually contains a document with the standards as initially proposed by
> Travis at the informal php|tek meeting, and originally proposed as a
> PEAR Group RFC on the public wiki at
> http://wiki.php.net/pear/rfc/pear2_naming_standards (back when
> the
> namespace separator was ::).
>
> A special thanks to our elected leaders for your service is due, it can
> be hard work running PEAR, and as the former president I appreciate the
> effort and sacrifices it takes to do a good job. All I ask is that each
> current candidate give us a description of where you stand on issues
> that are important to PEAR developers such as the new proposed coding
> standard, how PEAR2 should move forward, and related issues.
>
> Thanks,
> Greg
>
> --
> PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>