Re: candidates for PEAR Group: why should we vote for you? Tell us your plans and your history

From: Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:22:30 +0000
Subject: Re: candidates for PEAR Group: why should we vote for you? Tell us your plans and your history
References: 1  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-52000@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Does the pear president get paid? If not, then what are the benefits for being pear president? Is it just a bragging rights? On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Greg Beaver <greg@chiaraquartet.net> wrote: > Hi, > > As we near the next election for PEAR Group and President, I'd like to > ask all of the candidates to provide us with a brief history of their > contributions to PEAR, and why we should vote for you. This year, the > content of what has happened is more important than in previous years > because Pyrus and PEAR2 will be happening as a reality in the next > couple of weeks. > > In addition, I feel it is only appropriate that the existing PEAR Group > members and PEAR president who are running for re-election provide a > more thorough accounting of what they have been doing in the past year. > > The existing PEAR Group has been unable to formulate a complete coding > standard for PEAR2 (the first draft was approved and put in the manual > on Dec. 24, 2007, and expired on March 1, 2008, and was never renewed). > > In fact, a small subset of developers from the PEAR Group have taken the > step of discussing standards with outside projects and representing PEAR > as a project without first announcing what the new coding standards > would look like to pear-dev, or putting anything in the manual. If my > wording sounds harsh, it is intended to be so only as a call to action > and accountability for our elected leaders. > > We, the developer who will actually have to use these standards have at > the very least a passing interest in what they will be before they are > set in stone. The mailing list at > http://news.php.net/php.standards > catalogs some of the back-and-forth regarding the standards, and > actually contains a document with the standards as initially proposed by > Travis at the informal php|tek meeting, and originally proposed as a > PEAR Group RFC on the public wiki at > http://wiki.php.net/pear/rfc/pear2_naming_standards (back when > the > namespace separator was ::). > > A special thanks to our elected leaders for your service is due, it can > be hard work running PEAR, and as the former president I appreciate the > effort and sacrifices it takes to do a good job. All I ask is that each > current candidate give us a description of where you stand on issues > that are important to PEAR developers such as the new proposed coding > standard, how PEAR2 should move forward, and related issues. > > Thanks, > Greg > > -- > PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >

« previous php.pear.dev (#52000) next »