Re: [PEPr] Comment on Logging::Log_Growl

Hello Christian,

I like the growl integration for Log. What I don't understand is why you stick to php4, and why the class is named "Log_growl" and not "Log_Growl"? Why PHP4 ? Because all others handlers in standard PEAR::Log distribution are still backward compatible.

I know I made a PHP5 handler (Log_FirePHP) but it was on a period when FirePHPCore itself was only PHP5+ And the reason why I named it "Log_growl" and not "Log_Growl" is behind PEAR::Log code itself. See : function &factory($handler, $name = '', $ident = '', $conf = array(),

                     $level = PEAR_LOG_DEBUG)

{

       $handler = strtolower($handler);
       $class = 'Log_' . $handler;
       $classfile = 'Log/' . $handler . '.php';

Thanks to post the first comment ! And BTW, woah what a job on package proposals list !!! You impressed me :) Laurent