Re: Re: Fw: Licensing of some files in XML_RPC

Hey Edd, I'm interested in packaging XML_RPC for Ubuntu (and get it into Debian > too). I just had a look at the tarball and made a few observations: > > - tests/empty-value-struct.php and package2.xml refer to > http://de2.php.net/license/3_0.txt which was not approved by > the > Debian legal team > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/08/msg00128.html > was the > best link I could find to any discussion. > - there's no LICENSE files (some files are BSD licensed, some PHP 3.01, > some PHP 3.0) in the tarball. > > Would it be possible to relicense tests/empty-value-struct.php and add > the necessary license texts to a tarball and do a new release? > > That'd help us a lot and make it possible for the package to enter > Ubuntu and Debian (and help to get CiviCRM in as well :-)). (snip) > Sorry I haven't replied sooner. I just saw this message. It landed in > my mailing list box and I finally finished reading the type hinting > threads. :) > > I am okay with any license for the PEAR XML_RPC package. I have a baby > on the way and have several things to take care of (hopefully) before > then. Anyone who has a moment should feel free to change the licenses. > Do just be aware that this is a fork of Useful Inc's code. > Any thoughts, complaints or problems?