Re: [PEPr] Comment on HTTP::HTTP_OAuth

Hey Till, thanks for giving this package a look! > 1) Would you mind abstracting the HTTP-part and also allow people to use > HTTP_Request2? With HTTP_Request2 there are curl and socket, extensions 99% > of all PHP installs offer. With pecl_http the adoption of your package > could be considerably harder. I used pecl_http for the HttpMessage class and support for responses. The HTTP_OAuth_Consumer_Response, HTTP_OAuth_Provider_Request, and HTTP_OAuth_Provider_Response all decorate HttpMessage. I use HttpMessage::fromEnv() as a default way of constructing a response, therefore it will grab the existing headers set, body, etc. HTTP_Request2 does not have much support for responses. There is a lot of header parsing and setting in OAuth requests and I prefer not using header() directly. 2) How would you compare HTTP_Oauth to pecl/Oauth? [Just as a disclaimer, > I'm very much in favor of a pure PHP implementation vs. just a pecl ext, > this is more or less because I'm curios.] I originally set out to create an OAuth provider package but ended up adding consumer support because I already had a lot of code that could be used to create it. The pecl oauth extension does not have any provider support. Additionally I wanted to test my provider code and therefore needed to see more debug information from OAuth requests. Thanks! -jeff