Re: PHP license
| From: | till | Date: | Sun, 27 Jun 2010 17:47:37 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PHP license | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-53597@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Hannes Magnusson <bjori@php.net> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 18:33, till <till@php.net> wrote:
>> Didn't distros like Debian have major issues including PEAR packages
>> or software which relies on them because of the PHP license?
>>
>> This has been discussed before, but I can't find the threads now.
>
> The onlything I can find was issues with the license prior to 3.01
Maybe Helgi can dig up the threads later. :-)
Regardless of the above - and this is strictly IMHO - it's also not
"the more, the merrier" in this case. Supporting five licenses bears
plenty of trouble and insecurity. Not just for PEAR but also for
people consuming the components and wondering what these licenses are
all about.
I think that if we could trim that list it would make adoption easier
as well. I'm hoping people are already familiar enough with BSD,
Apache, MIT and LGPL.
My 2 cents.
Till