Re: Re: [pear-webmaster] "Popular Packages"
| From: | Alexey Borzov | Date: | Sun, 30 Oct 2011 10:19:28 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [pear-webmaster] "Popular Packages" | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev php.pear.webmaster |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-54545@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi Daniel,
On 30.10.2011 13:01, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Thanks! Looks like lots of packages were affected, indeed.Specifically, I'm seeing Net_URL2 2.0.0 released 2011-10-20 here with 495 downloads a day, but I'm not seeing HTTP_Request2 2.0.0 released 2011-10-20 with ~336 downloads a day. All fixed.
It just looks fishy that this package has around the same number of downloads as PEAR installer itself. With *zero* bug reports and feature requests throughout its history: http://pear.php.net/bugs/search.php?cmd=display&package_name[]=File_Mogile&status=All Are these legitimate downloads (even if automated somehow) or DB corruption?Also WTF is File_Mogile? Does it really have 100K downloads a month or is this creative approach to foreign key constraints? http://pear.php.net/package-**stats.php?pid=843&cid=9<http://pear.php.net/package-stats.php?pid=843&cid=9> I dunno - it's a client for http://danga.com/mogilefs/ ; and obviouslythere's a lot of people pushing applications into the cloud; plus someone is running off writing a pecl extension too. It's vaguely conceivable