Re: PEAR2 / Services_Pingback(2?)

Hello Васил, > IMHO, PEAR2_Services_Pingback wouldn't be confusing at all... IF (and > only IF!) PEAR1 never gets ahold of another package called > "Pingback2". Things could become confusing *then*. The package is not PEAR2_Services_Pingback but only Services_Pingback, from channel pear2.php.net. As such it is confusing. > After the PEAR2 package is published, it might be worth adding a > "deprecated in favor of PEAR2_Services_Pingback" link at the PEAR1 > page, to avoid any potential confusion (even though for me, > personally, the release date is a good enough guide). Yep, that's the plan. -- Regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen Christian Weiske -=≡ Geeking around in the name of science since 1982 ≡=-

Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] signature.asc