Re: PEAR2 / Services_Pingback(2?)

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Daniel Convissor <danielc@analysisandsolutions.com> wrote: > Hey Christian: > >> While I know that I won't get path conflicts by calling it >> Services_Pingback, I fear that people will get confused when there are >> 2 Services_Pingback packages, one on PEAR and one on PEAR2. > > I agree it can be confusing, particularly for people quickly reading > examples on line created by people other than yourself. May as well call > it 2 to cut down on that problem. I very much agree with Daniel: calling it Services_Pingback2 on PEAR2 *should* make things less confusing - especially for the speed-readers among us. Ken > -- > T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y > data intensive web and database programming > http://www.AnalysisAndSolutions.com/ > 4015 7th Ave #4, Brooklyn NY 11232 v: 718-854-0335 > > -- > PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > -- http://blogs.linux.ie/kenguest/