Re: PEAR_Exception-1.0.0beta1 (beta) Released.

Hello Alexey, > Helgi (or whoever released this), is this a good idea to do a > separate PEAR_Exception without releasing a new PEAR package > simultaneously? Current PEAR package contains PEAR_Exception class as > well and this will probably lead to conflicts. Yes, a new pear release is needed. > I don't quite remember what was the consensus last time this was > discussed, but from my point of view the best solution will be to > push a new PEAR 1.10.* > * with dependency on PHP 5+ > * without bundled PEAR_Exception class but > * with a required dependency on new PEAR_Exception package. Yep. > Also a new version of PEAR is long overdue with 1.9.4 released in > 2011 and 82 (!) bugs in the tracker. > > Is anyone working on PEAR at all? If not I may help a bit with bug > triage and possibly send some patches. Not really. Clockwerx is merging PRs now and then, but there are - in my eyes - some unstable patches in current master. The work we have to do is - create 1.10 branch - find out which patches can go into 1.10.0 - cherry-pick them from master master is too unstable for a no-dedicated-maintainer release. The gpg validation for example is not ready for release. -- Regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen Christian Weiske -=≡ Geeking around in the name of science since 1982 ≡=-

Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] signature.asc