Re: 2.0.0 (Re: [PEAR-DEV] PEAR 1.9.5 testing)

Hello Vasil, > > If we release PEAR 1.10 requiring PHP5, then > > * PHP4 users will not suffer a BC break since they will be unable to > upgrade to 1.10 > > * PHP5 users will not suffer a BC break since their code will > > continue to run happily I didn't consider that. Of course then we can use proper "static" keywords on PEAR::isError() and a couple of other methods in 1.10. > OK, then I agree about having PEAR 1.10 instead of PEAR 2.0.0. Pyrus > is after all itself more or less PEAR 2.0.0 (in fact, Pyrus assumes > itself supported if a package requires PEAR installer 2.0.0), so > having PEAR1 with a version 2.0.0 is only breaking and complicating > things for Pyrus, who's only problem is a lack of people contributing > to it. Yep, that's also a point I didn't pay attention to. So let's make the PHP5 only changes in 1.10. -- Regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen Christian Weiske -=≡ Geeking around in the name of science since 1982 ≡=-

Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] signature.asc