Re: 2.0.0 (Re: [PEAR-DEV] PEAR 1.9.5 testing)

On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Christian Weiske <cweiske@cweiske.de> wrote: > Hello Vasil, > > > > > If we release PEAR 1.10 requiring PHP5, then > > > * PHP4 users will not suffer a BC break since they will be unable to > > upgrade to 1.10 > > > * PHP5 users will not suffer a BC break since their code will > > > continue to run happily > > I didn't consider that. Of course then we can use proper "static" > keywords on PEAR::isError() and a couple of other methods in 1.10. > > > OK, then I agree about having PEAR 1.10 instead of PEAR 2.0.0. Pyrus > > is after all itself more or less PEAR 2.0.0 (in fact, Pyrus assumes > > itself supported if a package requires PEAR installer 2.0.0), so > > having PEAR1 with a version 2.0.0 is only breaking and complicating > > things for Pyrus, who's only problem is a lack of people contributing > > to it. > > Yep, that's also a point I didn't pay attention to. > > > So let's make the PHP5 only changes in 1.10. > I didn't know this either. +1 to 1.10 then. Till