Re: Image_Transform thoughts

At 03:37 AM 5/20/02 -0700, Dan Allen wrote:

In order to comply with the somewhat standard structures that have been established in PEAR for directory organization, wouldn't it make sense for Image_Transform to use the Container idea that Log and Auth use for the different "drivers" when organizing the directory structure, such as Image_Transform/ Transform.php Container/

    IM.php
    GD.php
    ...etc

It seems to me very logical and well thoughtout to do it in this way. Does anyone feel the same/object?

I'm open to any such suggestions. One arrangement I had been thinking of was: Image_Transform/ Image_Transform.php Drivers/

    IM.php
    GD.php
    NetPBM.php
    ...etc

but if your ones are the standard PEAR naming system then it would be better to stick to using that. Also, in the PEAR packages does everything get installed into its own directory as per the CVS setup, or are the Image_* items expected to end up in one directory? Peter. --oOo-- Narrow Gauge on the web - photos, directory and forums! http://www.narrow-gauge.co.uk --oOo-- Glenbranter - Scottish narrow gauge in 009 http://glenbranter.narrow-gauge.co.uk --oOo--