Re: Quote "draft"

Stig Bakken wrote: > > uhm, why do we really need this placeholder? there's no "db independent" > function layer and such, right? > Yeah and also it a little bit silly to have a placeholder for functions who won't change: insert into foo (?, ? ,!) => array(1, 'bar', 'now()'); when you could simply do: insert into foo (?, ? , now()) => array(1, 'bar'); But for apps that build queries, binary data, etc. this placeholder could be the solution. Do you think it so? Tomas V.V.Cox > On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Tomas V.V.Cox wrote: > > > Minor change to the draft: > > > > > > > > - Add a new placeholder char, for example "#" (please propose others). A > > > value in the position of a "#" should be returned without changes (for > > > example to not escape native SQL functions: insert into date ('id', > > > 'date') values (?, #) with an array => (1, NOW())). > > > > > > > yavor shahpasov, warn me about the probably risk of using the SQL > > comments char as placeholder, so I propose the new one "!" for this. > > Also the example I gave have a bug, it should be: > > insert into date ('id', 'date') values (?, #) with an array => (1, > > "NOW()") > > > > > > Tomas V.V.Cox > >