Re: patch for IT.php
| From: | Bertrand Mansion | Date: | Wed, 22 May 2002 11:06:42 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: patch for IT.php | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-6324@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
le 21/05/02 21:15, Dan Allen à dallen@bsiweb.com a écrit :
> One more small thing about this...I realize this feature is up in
> the air and is "outside" of the model (although I believe it is the
> one case where the model fails) and that you don't want to add it,
> but let's go from this angle. I need this one critical feature and
> I don't want to abandon the PEAR class and maintain it on my own
> over one stupid little feature like this. Could it at least be like
> a hidden or non-documented feature if up to this point you still
> don't find it necessary to add. I mean, the point of the PEAR
> classes after all is to use them and this class has not recieved an
> extremely wide base of usage (athough it should because its
> abilities are quite amazing and I am willing to put together some
> clear examples from my code) and I want to make use of it.
Hi Dan,
I only gave you my opinion why I would prefer not to have a feature like
this in ITX. I don't maintain the code so I won't add this feature for you.
Sure, I make some changes from time to time because there are identified
bugs but it's because I know Ulf Wendel is not always available.
I suggest 1. you talk to him directly, knowing the only reponse you had til
now were negative ones, 2. you maintain your own subclass of IT, 3. you
change your code to put the delimiters where you want, 4. you change your
template.
Sorry, that's all I can say. It's not against you.
Bertrand Mansion
Mamasam