Re: RE: [PEAR-CVS] cvs: pearweb /public_html package-search.php /public_html/gifs calendar.gif tri-back.gif tri.gif /public_html/javascript/calendar
calendar.css calendar.js /public_html/javascript/xbApi xbApi.common.js xbApi.dom.js xbApi.ie.js xbApi.loade
| From: | Stig S. Bakken | Date: | Mon, 27 May 2002 10:56:39 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: RE: [PEAR-CVS] cvs: pearweb /public_html package-search.php /public_html/gifs calendar.gif tri-back.gif tri.gif /public_html/javascript/calendar calendar.css calendar.js /public_html/javascript/xbApi xbApi.common.js xbApi.dom.js xbApi.ie.js xbApi.loade |
||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-6466@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, 2002-05-27 at 12:17, Martin Jansen wrote:
> On Mon, 27 May 2002 10:22:50 +0100, Richard Heyes wrote:
>
> >> Wouldn't it be better to move package-search.html back into
> >> package-search.php? From my point of view it doesn't make much sense
> >> to split this up.
> >
> >Templates are the way to go imho. It certainly makes the code easier to
> >read and maintain.
>
> Yeah, but we didn't implement a stable template system yet. And
> simply using include("template.html") isn't a real template engine
> btw, even if it's the fastest one :).
Sure it's a real template engine. Flexible, fast and full-featured.
- Stig