Re[2]: [PEAR-DEV] Re: Idea

Hi, >> import('PEAR.Cache'); or the like. That would be great ! I thing there's a bad way of doing things in the current tree dependent package names. > This makes only sense with an namespace Namespaces would give us more flexibility ... > which was already canceled by Zeev on the ScriptEngine2-mailinglist Did he explain why he canceled it ? Is there any archive of this message ? > It seems to be no chance for this until a lot of PEAR programmers > ask for it. Should we make a petition ??? ;) Nicolas. -- Nicolas HOIZEY - Internet technologies Analyst TechMetrix Research : http://www.techmetrix.com Free PHP projects : http://www.phpheaven.net Veille tous azimuts (fr) : http://www.gasteroprod.com