Re: cvs: pear /PEAR_Frontend_Gtk package.xml

ok, zlib was not built into the portable so I cant make packages - for some reason the pear package just died with no Fatal error here when I tried using phpCLI + pearCLI pear package ./package.xml - anyway the stuff below was an attempt to fix the issue that testing here ended up with all the files in the PEAR/Frontend Directory instead of Laid out as per CVS... - will look closer tommorow - it may just be this rather chaotic install on the portable.. regards alan Tomas V.V.Cox wrote:

Martin Jansen wrote:

On Thu, 13 Jun 2002 15:27:46 -0000, Alan Knowles wrote:

alan_k         Thu Jun 13 11:27:46 2002 EDT

Modified files:

  /pear/PEAR_Frontend_Gtk    package.xml

Log: attempting to fix package file Index: pear/PEAR_Frontend_Gtk/package.xml diff -u pear/PEAR_Frontend_Gtk/package.xml:1.4 pear/PEAR_Frontend_Gtk/package.xml:1.5

--- pear/PEAR_Frontend_Gtk/package.xml:1.4     Thu Jun 13 05:37:02 2002

+++ pear/PEAR_Frontend_Gtk/package.xml Thu Jun 13 11:27:46 2002 @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ <filelist>

     <dir name="/" baseinstalldir="PEAR/Frontend">
             <file role="php">Gtk.php</file>
-              <dir name="Gtk">
+              <dir name="Gtk" role="php">
     

If this is really required by the packager, I'm strongly +1 for changing this: I don't see a good point why a directory should have a role, since it may be possible that one directory may contain files of different types.

The <dir role="XXX"> is just for lazy developers. A way of saying: "all the files inside this dir are of role XXXX if no other is specified". Tomas V.V.Cox