Re: Config class

<chuck@horde.org> wrote : >>> I've looked at the various forms stuff in PEAR before, and I might have >>> missed something or it might be a while since I looked, but I haven't found >>> anything that's less tied to HTML and lets you create forms which really >>> handles themselves and their validation nicely. The FormSprocket:: lib, what >>> I've been working on in Horde, provides all of this, with configurable >>> rendererers, etc. > Quoting Bertrand Mansion <bmansion@mamasam.com>: > >> It must have been a long time since you haven't look in PEAR. QuickForm >> surely does more than your FormSprocket lib and is certainly much more >> flexible. Well, that's my not so humble opinion at least. > > I'd love to get more involved in PEAR development again and to push things > forward. I don't have the energy to do it if this is going to be the response. As a reminder, I have added what you wrote in the first place so that you can read it again. I am just wondering when was the last time you looked at PEAR and if you ever had a look at QuickForm or even OOHForm. Nobody likes to hear the work he has done is bad, especially when it comes from someone that didn't take the time to check what he says. I admit my reply was brutal in the first place but now you know how I felt. Apart from that, there are no worries. Bertrand Mansion Mamasam