Re: Re: cvs: pear /PECL/smbc CREDITS IMPORTANT LICENSE Makefile.in config.m4 package.xml php_smbc.h smbc.c /PECL/smbc/tests 001.phpt 002.phpt
| From: | Jelmer Vernooij | Date: | Fri, 23 Aug 2002 03:44:22 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: cvs: pear /PECL/smbc CREDITS IMPORTANT LICENSE Makefile.in config.m4 package.xml php_smbc.h smbc.c /PECL/smbc/tests 001.phpt 002.phpt | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-8602@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 08:14:00PM -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote about 'Re: [PEAR-DEV] Re:
[PEAR-CVS] cvs: pear /PECL/smbc CREDITS IMPORTANT LICENSE Makefile.in config.m4 package.xml
php_smbc.h smbc.c /PECL/smbc/tests 001.phpt 002.phpt':
> > Mmh, It still all sounds a bit silly... -
> > eg. "Samba Group grants permision for this library to be used and linked
> > against PHP..", since the Samba Group retain the copyright in theory,
> > they have the liberty to say how it can be used.
> > Rasmus did you get anywhere with stalman on discussing these
> > 'opt-outs', to solve issue like this???
> Yes, I have discussed this with him and this is a perfectly suitable
> solution that he has no issue with. But, usually the people who develop
> libraries and put them under the GPL do so because they do not want the
> code to be re-usable under non-GPL terms, and by granting PHP permission
> to use it they are opening themselves up somewhat. In this particular
> case I believe the exposure to be minimal as there is no libsmbclient code
> in the actual extension and the only thing required is a statement from
> the Samba team that PHP is allowed to link libsmbclient against this
> particular extension.
I'll discuss it here (the whole samba team is currently together on a
conference),
Jelmer
--