Re: Re: 4.2.3 and the new PEAR package

On Sun, 25 Aug 2002, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote: > On Sun, 25 Aug 2002 14:32:13 +0200 > "Tomas V.V.Cox" <cox@idecnet.com> wrote: > > > Pierre-Alain Joye wrote: > > > > > I've only received from you problems with go-pear. Is there any problem > > with the pear cmd under Windows? Umm, perhaps the branch does not > > include the lastest versions. > > There is problem with env variables, I solved them using getenv and > tests before. Especially with system_root and tmp. FWIW, output buffering for go-pear still doesn't work correctly for me under 4.3.0-dev. (This is Redhat 7.3.) If I explictly set output_buffering=off in my php.ini file, everything is fine; however, with output_buffering=4096 (default for php.ini-recommended) I can't get it to work correctly even if I add "-d output_buffering=off" on the command line. On a related note, I've been playing with "pear build" on Unix and I've stumbled across some similar $_ENV bugs. There's an $_ENV['HOME'] that fails; I'm currently working on fixing up an opendir('modules') call that seems to be an include_path issue. Since php.ini-recommended removes E from variables_order, PEAR authors should never assume they can use $_ENV, IMHO. I am working on a patch to pear once I track down all the issues. -adam -- adam maccabee trachtenberg adam@trachtenberg.com