Re: [APD] Some Problems
| From: | Christian Dickmann | Date: | Sun, 01 Sep 2002 19:39:16 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [APD] Some Problems | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-8812@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> > Then I read that I need the CGI version, so maybe these
> > crashes where expected behavior.
>
> You don't need the cgi version (where did you read that?). This is not
> expected behavior. Are you using the last rolled version from the apd
> site, current cvs or the execute_wrapper branch? I'm going to assume
> it's one of the two former ones, as I could duplicate you error there.
> It's been fixed in cvs (just now).
http://cvs.php.net/co.php/peardoc/en/pecl/apd.xml
and
http://cvs.php.net/co.php/pear/PECL/apd/README?r=1.11
say: "Make sure you have installed the CGI version of PHP ..."
I am using current CVS.
> There are some issues with the class <-> method identification in the
> current HEAD. If what you're interested in is the pprof tracing (which
> imho is more than a full replacement for the session_trace stuff), try
> doing a cvs update -r execute_wrapper in the apd dir.
Ok. I will do this ...
But I really don't know what I am interested in ;) I just thought "APD looks
cool, so lets see what it offers ..."
> That enables a
> profiling methodology which is hoped to be both faster and more
> accurate. apd_callstack doesn't work there, but if you're using head,
> then I think that Thies' backtrace function has been integrated into ZE
> anyway.
how is it named? (the new backtrace function) I read I need ext/xdebug
or ZE2, or am I wrong?
Christian DIckmann