Re: [APD] Some Problems

From: Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2002 19:39:16 +0000
Subject: Re: [APD] Some Problems
References: 1 2  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-8812@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
> > Then I read that I need the CGI version, so maybe these > > crashes where expected behavior. > > You don't need the cgi version (where did you read that?). This is not > expected behavior. Are you using the last rolled version from the apd > site, current cvs or the execute_wrapper branch? I'm going to assume > it's one of the two former ones, as I could duplicate you error there. > It's been fixed in cvs (just now). http://cvs.php.net/co.php/peardoc/en/pecl/apd.xml and http://cvs.php.net/co.php/pear/PECL/apd/README?r=1.11 say: "Make sure you have installed the CGI version of PHP ..." I am using current CVS. > There are some issues with the class <-> method identification in the > current HEAD. If what you're interested in is the pprof tracing (which > imho is more than a full replacement for the session_trace stuff), try > doing a cvs update -r execute_wrapper in the apd dir. Ok. I will do this ... But I really don't know what I am interested in ;) I just thought "APD looks cool, so lets see what it offers ..." > That enables a > profiling methodology which is hoped to be both faster and more > accurate. apd_callstack doesn't work there, but if you're using head, > then I think that Thies' backtrace function has been integrated into ZE > anyway. how is it named? (the new backtrace function) I read I need ext/xdebug or ZE2, or am I wrong? Christian DIckmann

« previous php.pear.dev (#8812) next »