Re: Alternative MySQL PEAR DB sequence behavior
| From: | Stig S. Bakken | Date: | Sun, 22 Jul 2001 01:31:24 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Alternative MySQL PEAR DB sequence behavior | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-948@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Oleg Rekutin wrote:
>
> Current MySQL sequence emulation simply keeps adding and adding IDs to the
> sequence's table. This bothered me, because a lot of sequences with a lot of
> IDs are just going to take up space for no reason.
>
> So I modified it to keep track of just one value... Haven't tested it
> rigorously, but AFAIK it works. Patch is quoted below. (So here I am, having
> wasted 1.5 hours on this patch when I have an urgent project otherwise :).)
>
> It also backwards-compatible, as it cleans up the garbage from the old-style
> sequences (otherwise UPDATE fails), so that nothing has to be done on the
> part of the user when the new mechanism is used. In addition, since the new-
> style sequences use the same tables w/ an AUTO_INCREMENT id, it is also
> backwards-compatible in the sense that if the user downgrades to the old-
> style mechanism or moves the DB & application to a server with an older
> version of PEAR DB, everything should still work (it will just keep on
> inserting values).
>
> Deep inside I want all sequences to be contained in one table, but that's
> too much of a pain in the ass to do, plus various concurrency issues arise
> (there are concurrency issues nonetheless, mostly arising from the fact if
> two clients attempt to create two sequences simultaneously... CREATE
> DATABASE will fail for one of them... might want to use CREATE DATABASE IF
> NOT EXISTS then?).
>
> Again, you might want to run tests of your own... Works for me :)
I've committed this patch now, and it works fine except that the first
id returned seems to be 2? At least in the case of
DB/tests/mysql/005.phpt. Any ideas?
- Stig