Re: Alternative MySQL PEAR DB sequence behavior
| From: | Tomas V.V.Cox | Date: | Sun, 22 Jul 2001 14:22:00 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Alternative MySQL PEAR DB sequence behavior | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-972@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
"Stig S. Bakken" wrote:
>
> Oleg Rekutin wrote:
> >
> > Current MySQL sequence emulation simply keeps adding and adding IDs to the
> > sequence's table. This bothered me, because a lot of sequences with a lot of
> > IDs are just going to take up space for no reason.
> >
> > So I modified it to keep track of just one value... Haven't tested it
> > rigorously, but AFAIK it works. Patch is quoted below. (So here I am, having
> > wasted 1.5 hours on this patch when I have an urgent project otherwise :).)
> >
> > It also backwards-compatible, as it cleans up the garbage from the old-style
> > sequences (otherwise UPDATE fails), so that nothing has to be done on the
> > part of the user when the new mechanism is used. In addition, since the new-
> > style sequences use the same tables w/ an AUTO_INCREMENT id, it is also
> > backwards-compatible in the sense that if the user downgrades to the old-
> > style mechanism or moves the DB & application to a server with an older
> > version of PEAR DB, everything should still work (it will just keep on
> > inserting values).
> >
> > Deep inside I want all sequences to be contained in one table, but that's
> > too much of a pain in the ass to do, plus various concurrency issues arise
> > (there are concurrency issues nonetheless, mostly arising from the fact if
> > two clients attempt to create two sequences simultaneously... CREATE
> > DATABASE will fail for one of them... might want to use CREATE DATABASE IF
> > NOT EXISTS then?).
> >
> > Again, you might want to run tests of your own... Works for me :)
>
> I've committed this patch now, and it works fine except that the first
> id returned seems to be 2? At least in the case of
> DB/tests/mysql/005.phpt. Any ideas?
It seems that INSERT INTO ${sqn}_seq VALUES(0) in createSequence inserts
the value "1", so update always get at least value 2. Should I change
the test?
Tomas V.V.Cox
PS. I've commited the new version of the patch Oleg send me time ago