RE: [PEAR-DEV] package pages

I agree, documentation is for stable or more stable information then todo lists and kinds. I was not saying it is a bad thing to have a project page, i'm quite for it. But it must not conflict with the documentation effort i think. Arnaud. > the point is not the replace efforts to provide documentation > in docbook > form, but rather to give an option for all content that has not been > ported or is too short lived to make sense to keep in the manual (like > todo lists)