Re: package pages

From: Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 13:34:32 +0000
Subject: Re: package pages
References: 1 2  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-9921@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Mon, 07 Oct 2002 14:33:35 +0100 Michael Dransfield <mike@blueroot.net> wrote: > I agree, but there is also a lot of confusion about where and how to > write documents. For example, I was under the impression that the > comments in our code would be extracted to form the docs on the pear > website, then I find out that I need to copy this into docBook format > (something I know next to nothing about), then there is a doc > directory which contains html, txt and any other format that the > author felt like using. > > One of the main benefits of php is the great documentation, I wouldnt > like to see this lost with pear. > > Oh, and I agree that a project page would be nice (for PEAR > developers), so long as it wasnt a replacement for good documentation. Project page is a good idea : +1 About documentations and references, we have got a discussion (during the summer, check the archives ;-) ). We can see 2 different docs, the dev reference (from phpdoc) and tutorials/enduser doc. I ll like to see the last one in XML docbook (do not talk about sgml please :-), we can convert it later), easy to write on our common word processor and convert it to whatever we need. hth pa

« previous php.pear.dev (#9921) next »