Re: pear calendar

On 16 May 2004 at 19:17, Site Resources wrote: > Thanks for your help. You answered my second question fine. I could be wrong but I don't > think there is supposed to be a year 0. Just from year 1 BCE to year 1 CE; but my understanding may > be wrong. but that doesn't matter here. I've tried out year 0 in the calendar and that > also works fine. > > Ok, I will try to rephrase what I said. As for the source, it is 193 lines and so...well > I'll post that at the bottom. you can look at it if you don't understand my question still > after I explain it here. Well, I was able to replay the scenario you described with the source you provided. But still I wonder why you're going for "month = 0" in your example. Simply consider changing month = 0 and year = 2004 to month = 12 and year = 2004 ... where's the problem? Note that the same applies also for "Next month" where from year 2003, month 12 you jump to year 2003, month 13 ... which should actually be month 1 or year 2004. Maybe somebody from the Date-team could comment as well if they could integrate some checks to do things like this automatically. But I wonder why anybody would call a function with a month-value out of bounds [1..12]. Regards, Stefan