Re: pear calendar

Stefan Neufeind wrote: > On 16 May 2004 at 19:17, Site Resources wrote: > > Thanks for your help. You answered my second question fine. I could be wrong but I don't think there is supposed to be a year 0. Just from year 1 BCE to year 1 CE; but my understanding may be wrong. but that doesn't matter here. I've tried out year 0 in the calendar and that also works fine. > > > > Ok, I will try to rephrase what I said. As for the source, it is 193 lines and so...well I'll post that at the bottom. you can look at it if you don't understand my question still after I explain it here. > Well, I was able to replay the scenario you described with the source > you provided. But still I wonder why you're going for "month = 0" in > your example. Simply consider changing month = 0 and year = 2004 to > month = 12 and year = 2004 ... where's the problem? Note that the > same applies also for "Next month" where from year 2003, month 12 you > jump to year 2003, month 13 ... which should actually be month 1 or > year 2004. > Maybe somebody from the Date-team could comment as well if they could > integrate some checks to do things like this automatically. But I > wonder why anybody would call a function with a month-value out of > bounds [1..12]. > Regards, > Stefan Yes I could do that, but I also wanted to be able to adjust the date no matter what is entered instead of having to give an error. If nothing else is possible I can do that, but if anyone knows why this is happening, that'd be great.