Re: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] HTML_Template_Flexy-0.9.2 (beta) Released.

Jacques wrote: >Hi my friends! > >I have a litle doubt about Template_Flexy_Elements and QuickForm. It´s >possible to use only Template_Flexy_Elements (with server/client >validations) to build my forms, or i need to use too the QuickForm? I am not sure Flexy provides client-side validation but I am sure QuickForm does. Using the QuickForm renderers, it is possible to integrate both Flexy and QuickForm, something that apparently Alan Knowles didn't manage to do for the reasons he stated in his mail. >What is the best solution? Only Template_Flexy_Elements, only QuickForm >ou QuickForm renderer with flexy? I wouldn't ask the question in these terms because it is like asking which is the best template engine and the answer will depend on your own experience. Personally, I prefer to use HTML_Template_Sigma with HTML_QuickForm (and its controller) when forms are needed and remove all the logic from my templates. This is true MVC for me. Above that you add a little url handler like Ismo_Core (ismo.sf.net) and you are ready to develop great web applications. There are other ways to go. WACT might be interesting for you as well (wact.sf.net). Good luck, Bertrand Mansion Mamasam