RE: [PEAR] Pear DB LastInsertID

I don't have a problem with it either. The only esthetic thing I can think of is that it would be nice if the seq tables had a configurable prefix. When you have to view the tables it would be nice to have them grouped together so that they don't clutter up phpMyAdmin or whatever db admin tool you happen to use. You wouldn't confuse them with other tables. Not a big deal but I thought it might be worth mentioning. Matt Friedman -----Original Message----- From: Jonas Koch Bentzen [mailto:test@understroem.dk] Sent: Sunday July 14, 2002 11:50 AM To: pear-general@lists.php.net Subject: Re: [PEAR] Pear DB LastInsertID shaggy@vip.bg skrev: > > Anyway I use PEAR sequences but I don't like the fact that it creates > a separate table in MySQL for every sequence I don't see it as a problem at all, because you never have to care about, even look at, the sequence tables. Say you're making an open source application... You write a script that creates the tables and runs DB::createSequence() for each table. Then, in your application, you use DB::nextId() to handle the sequences. You never have to look at or do something with the sequence tables. -- PEAR General Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php