RE: [PEAR] Pear DB LastInsertID

> I don't have a problem with it either. The only esthetic thing I can > think of is that it would be nice if the seq tables had a configurable > prefix. But you can configure it ! I don't remember how but you can change the sequence format name somewhere in the options. So you can make them start with seq_ or whatever so that they are grouped. Arnaud. > When you have to view the tables it would be nice to have them grouped > together so that they don't clutter up phpMyAdmin or whatever db admin > tool you happen to use. You wouldn't confuse them with other tables. > > Not a big deal but I thought it might be worth mentioning. > > Matt Friedman > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jonas Koch Bentzen [mailto:test@understroem.dk] > Sent: Sunday July 14, 2002 11:50 AM > To: pear-general@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PEAR] Pear DB LastInsertID > > shaggy@vip.bg skrev: > > > > Anyway I use PEAR sequences but I don't like the fact that > it creates > > a separate table in MySQL for every sequence > > I don't see it as a problem at all, because you never have to care > about, even look at, the sequence tables. Say you're making an open > source application... You write a script that creates the tables and > runs DB::createSequence() for each table. Then, in your > application, you > > use DB::nextId() to handle the sequences. You never have to > look at or > do something with the sequence tables. > > > -- > PEAR General Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > > -- > PEAR General Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >