Re: Feature Request: deeper TOC for pear.php.net manual

From: Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 09:57:27 +0000
Subject: Re: Feature Request: deeper TOC for pear.php.net manual
References: 1  Groups: php.pear.doc php.pear.general 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-general+get-5156@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Greg Beaver wrote:
In addition, do the template engines in PEAR really require HTML to work? Why not put them into a category called "Templates" or "Template Engines?" Math/Numbers should be combined into one category, or differentiated more. It would no problem to write, but this is the best way to confuse users.
Also you lost a big advantage: an automatic link (not in sense of a hyperlink only) between package doc and the package itself. Will thinking about peardoc2, i played with flatter and deeper TOCs, the current way is IMO the best compromiss.

« previous php.pear.general (#5156) next »