Re: Bug in HTML_Template_Sigma

Hi! Lukas Smith wrote:

Of course it is important we don't confuse users. We have enough (IT-inspired) template engines to get confused about.

There is a Russian saying 'to get lost in three pine-trees'. To get lost in *two* template engines is even more difficult. ;

So let's keep the plugging to a minimum, like when a user definitely says that he is using for a feature X that is really not available in the (IT-inspired) template engine in question.

That's *exactly* what I am doing. If you check the archives, the author of the current thread was unhappy with IT's (lack of) error handling in some cases. And I'll continue to promote my package in such a way. P.S. Saying 'Sigma has nothing to do with IT' is ridiculous: they are both template engines and share common API. 'MDB has nothing to do with DB', anyone?