Re: [Kopia] [PHP-DB] Re: [PEAR] Re: [binarycloud-dev] Re: [PEAR-DEV] Re: [metabase-dev] RE: [PEAR-DEV] New Metabase Aniversary release

From: Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 04:46:09 +0000
Subject: Re: [Kopia] [PHP-DB] Re: [PEAR] Re: [binarycloud-dev] Re: [PEAR-DEV] Re: [metabase-dev] RE: [PEAR-DEV] New Metabase Aniversary release
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.db php.general php.pear.dev php.pear.general php.windows 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-general+get-704@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hello, gekked wrote: > This discussion is interesting to me because I joined this list to > find out answers to these questions. > > Currently, we are working on a codebase for use with Indymedia > websites (http://www.indymedia.org/) which can be seen at > http://tech.sfimc.net/ > > The point is to develop a set of classes which can be reused to > building Indymedia sites. > > Part of that includes a db abstraction class and a template class. I > came here to find out if we should be moving towards PEAR's equivalent > classes. > > But now I don't know. So, is PEAR an application framework (which is > what I would call what we are doing)? Or can someone explain the > difference between a framework and a "pool of classes that follow > coding standards"? Maybe for what you want you would like to try BinaryCloud. That's is a well thought application framework, IMHO. http://binarycloud.tigris.org/ Regards, Manuel Lemos

« previous php.pear.general (#704) next »