Package status

Hi, unfortunately I wasn't able to follow the pear meeting but for a few minutes, so I don't know if a decision was taken on this matter. I'm about to release a new (minor) version of [M]DB_QueryTool; both packages have been labeled as "stable" for several months, even if they're below 1.0.0 (because there was no guideline back then). Should I keep the "stable" label for the next releases, or should I mark them as "beta", as the latest directives may suggest? ----- Similar topic, different package: Translation2. It has the "2" suffix in the name since it's a complete rewrite, but what should the package number be? I started with 0.x, then I used 2.x since it was decided so in the last naming guidelines (now "freezed"), but I'm don't completely understand why I should start from 2.x since it's a completely different package from Translation 1.x. Other two examples in pear are: I18Nv2 => 0.x MDB2 => 2.x which don't help clarifying this topic :-) Best regards, -- Lorenzo Alberton http://pear.php.net/user/quipo