Re: Package status

On Tue, 4 May 2004 17:23:06 +0200, Klaus Guenther wrote: > From: "Lorenzo Alberton" <l.alberton@quipo.it> >> Similar topic, different package: Translation2. >> It has the "2" suffix in the name since it's a complete rewrite, >> but what should the package number be? I started with 0.x, then I >> used 2.x since it was decided so in the last naming guidelines >> (now "freezed"), but I'm don't completely understand why I should >> start from 2.x since it's a completely different package from >> Translation 1.x. > > Basically, Translation2 would have been Translation 2.x under the > old system. Therefore, the Translation2 series will bear the > version numbering 2.x. Development releases, etc. should be 0.x. > First stable should be 2.x. (Translation3 == 3.x, etc). This has > been discussed a few times on this list, and this is the > understanding I've taken away. that's was my understanding too, but AFAIK the decision was not agreed upon by everyone, so the rule was put on hold. Is that a definitive rule, now, after the meeting? I have no strong opinion on it, so I'll stick to the regulations, once I've understood if they're official. thanks, -- Lorenzo Alberton http://pear.php.net/user/quipo