Re: Re: [pear-webmaster] Re: [PEAR-QA] Thought about unmaintained package (Net_IRC in this case)
| From: | Daniel Convissor | Date: | Thu, 16 Dec 2004 17:46:43 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [pear-webmaster] Re: [PEAR-QA] Thought about unmaintained package (Net_IRC in this case) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.pear.qa php.pear.webmaster |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-2214@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi Klaus:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 06:35:54PM +0100, Klaus Guenther wrote:
>
> I would also suggest adding an "unmaintained" flag field... because
> there are some packages that are not superceded by another package but
> are no longer being maintained.
To save on database columns, etc, I'd suggest putting the word
"unmaintained" in the deprecated column and when performing output, have
an if statement that displays an appropriate message.
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y
data intensive web and database programming
http://www.AnalysisAndSolutions.com/
4015 7th Ave #4, Brooklyn NY 11232 v: 718-854-0335 f: 718-854-0409