Re: PEAR Bug Summary Report
| From: | bertrand Gugger | Date: | Tue, 21 Dec 2004 22:35:28 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PEAR Bug Summary Report | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.pear.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-2239@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Helgi Þormar wrote:
Note joking, PHP Internals use this format and have been using it for quite long time. Then, I must be external and young. Anyway, which "format" you mean ?
("processed" better english as "proceded", apologies) "read" for human, "processed" for machines to transform in "read" for humans Other words, a long list of bugs each month is nothing for us, we need to make the diff. Thanx, if we get the base, we will process that, or tell a machine to do that. Bye -- bertrand Gugger (toggg)Long lists are not to be read, just processed. That's my point.