Re: PEAR Bug Summary Report

From: Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 22:54:50 +0000
Subject: Re: PEAR Bug Summary Report
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6  Groups: php.pear.qa 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-2240@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 22:35, bertrand Gugger wrote: > Helgi Þormar wrote: > > >Note joking, PHP Internals use this format and have been using it for > >quite long time. > > > > > Then, I must be external and young. Anyway, which "format" you mean ? The long list thing. > >>Long lists are not to be read, just processed. > >> > >> > That's my point. > ("processed" better english as "proceded", apologies) > "read" for human, "processed" for machines to transform in "read" > for humans > Other words, a long list of bugs each month is nothing for us, we need > to make the diff. Don't mix us with me in that sentence :-) You're talking for your self here, not the whole list ;) But yes diffs would be good, but like I said it's not that easy as of current, as is I'd have to store the whole array in DB serialized and diff it against the new one each month, and we'd not even be getting full changelog nor anything like that. So this request of yours has to wait until we've implanted a changelog feature in the bug system (which logs each changes). > Thanx, if we get the base, we will process that, or tell a machine to do > that. > > Bye

« previous php.pear.qa (#2240) next »