Re: PEAR Bug Summary Report
| From: | Helgi Þormar | Date: | Tue, 21 Dec 2004 22:54:50 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PEAR Bug Summary Report | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.pear.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-2240@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 22:35, bertrand Gugger wrote:
> Helgi Þormar wrote:
>
> >Note joking, PHP Internals use this format and have been using it for
> >quite long time.
> >
> >
> Then, I must be external and young. Anyway, which "format" you mean ?
The long list thing.
> >>Long lists are not to be read, just processed.
> >>
> >>
> That's my point.
> ("processed" better english as "proceded", apologies)
> "read" for human, "processed" for machines to transform in "read"
> for humans
> Other words, a long list of bugs each month is nothing for us, we need
> to make the diff.
Don't mix us with me in that sentence :-) You're talking for your self
here, not the whole list ;)
But yes diffs would be good, but like I said it's not that easy as of
current, as is I'd have to store the whole array in DB serialized and
diff it against the new one each month, and we'd not even be getting
full changelog nor anything like that.
So this request of yours has to wait until we've implanted a changelog
feature in the bug system (which logs each changes).
> Thanx, if we get the base, we will process that, or tell a machine to do
> that.
>
> Bye