Re: Re: If / where to send trackback notifications

Oii, What I think of this is that we shouldn't make a new list nor send it to any list at all, we send enough of stuff to the lists already, no need to flood any more then we need :-) Now for what I think of this, Pierre rightfully says that those are mostly short blogs, and IMHO that won't help us very much, I want to see this off pear.php.net asap, kinda, but I'm not against having this on the wiki when it's up, that's where it should be actually, since that's meant to give us more flexibility in documenting things and if those trackbacks will do the same, then why not write this into the wiki as a module ;) It could even be a option if the trackback stuff is turned on or not, similar to how the wiki's will be enabled (arnaud knows what I'm talking about). That's what I think of this subject at least. On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 10:14, Klaus Guenther wrote: > Klaus Guenther wrote: > > Pierre-Alain Joye wrote: > > > >>> OK, if you don't see that approving/deleting trackbacks belongs to > >>> a webmasters action, I propose to send the trackback mails to > >>> pear-qa. The reason for that is, that the goal of my trackback > >>> implementation > >>> is to raise the ammount of documentation for packages, which raises > >>> the quality of our packages. > >> > >> > >> > >> Couple of lines in a blog entry are not really documentations... I'm > >> pretty sure most of them will be from blogs only. > > > > > > Heh... and not even necessarily positive lines :) Which is part of why > > maintainers should be aware of these mentions. Of course, something like > > QF will get a _lot_ more mentions than Net_Trackback (or Console_Table, > > etc.). I just hope Alexey won't to ballistic when the trackbacks start > > ^go > > > pouring in. ;) > > > > Thanks > > > > Klaus > >