Re: Re: Text_Wiki, is the lead still active?

Bonsoir, Paul M. Jones wrote:

(b) would be my preference as well; I'd be very happy to have a volunteer in the position. Bertrand Gugger has been quite pro-active. I'll contact him off-list and see if he'd like a lead position. Paul, you know I like it.

Not such to become lead, but to have a reactive package. The stuff is growing largely and will need more devs, as you know. Validate's experience shows that more devs implies more leads. Now, we speak here from going from single lead to several (starting 2). It's vital for major packages. Text_Wiki is. I even defended the point of view that it should be at least 1 in each half of the world so important packages have kinda 24/24. We're good for that :) Next is the technical question of Text_Wiki split, what is main ? are parsers and renderers of same kind to pack together ? I know it's a pain, but my opininion is to make so many packages as Parsers+Renderers e.g. Xhtml parser (future) in a different package as Xhtml renderer. I'm really aware this piece has the open software spirit (as have so many contributors) but is strict respecting some rules. Thanks for your trust. à+ -- bertrand "toggg" Gugger