Re: Re: Text_Wiki, is the lead still active?
| From: | Paul M Jones | Date: | Sun, 11 Sep 2005 16:58:42 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Text_Wiki, is the lead still active? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-2997@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi Bertrand,
Paul, you know I like it. Not such to become lead, but to have a reactive package. The stuff is growing largely and will need more devs, as you know. Validate's experience shows that more devs implies more leads.Let's start by adding you as a lead then. :-) Shall I add you today?
Next is the technical question of Text_Wiki split, what is main ? are parsers and renderers of same kind to pack together ? I know it's a pain, but my opininion is to make so many packages as Parsers+Renderers e.g. Xhtml parser (future) in a different package as Xhtml renderer.The problem there is that the parse/render pairs need to be interchangeable; e.g., a BBCode parser should be able to output via a Latex renderer. But as long as the lead on a particular parser/render pair adheres to this and adds things as they appear in other parser/render pairs, then yes, that sounds like the most manageable solution. Good idea.
I'm really aware this piece has the open software spirit (as have so many contributors) but is strict respecting some rules. Thanks for your trust.You have earned it, sir. :-) -- Paul M. Jones <http://paul-m-jones.com> Solar: Simple Object Library and Application Repository for PHP5. <http://solarphp.com> Savant: The simple, elegant, and powerful alternative to Smarty for templates in PHP. <http://phpsavant.com>