Re: QA releases RFC

On 9/12/05, Arnaud Limbourg <arnaud@limbourg.com> wrote: > It will clutter the diagram but i'll see what I can do (a legend might > be better suited). Since there are multiple possible paths it's best to have them. Simple, small arrows would suffice. It shouldn't make the diagram all that much bigger. (IMHO the labels really shouldn't be overlapping the "boxes" either...). I, for one, had a little trouble when I first traced through the diagram, knowing which way things went. I figured it out, but I shouldn't have to induce the flow. It should be obvious (i.e. with arrows) which way the flow goes. Especially when you have multiple lines converging on one point (like the 3 lines which merge and connect to the purple box). > > Arnaud. > > Helgi Þormar wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 12:01 -0400, Arnaud Limbourg wrote: > > > >>I'll add arrows :) > >> > >>Can you point out where "no" need to be added ? > > > > > > Look for squares that have "yes" to the right ... Most of them lack > > "no" > > below them. > > Like said, it does not have to be added, just clearer to have them. > > > > - Helgi > > > > -- > PEAR QA Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- Justin Patrin