Re: Re: Assumptions PEAR QA survey

On Monday, December 15, 2003 11:03 PM "Pierre-Alain Joye" <paj@pearfr.org> wrote: > On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 22:56:54 +0100 > "Klaus Guenther" <klaus@capitalfocus.org> wrote: > > Hmm... wouldn't it be better to have it in ./qa/survey.php? > > Will QA members (possibly anyone with a PEAR account) have access to > > the results? > > Will they be live? etc. etc. > > Well the result will be public anyway. I understand that. But who will be responsible for it? the pear group? If it belongs to QA, shouldn't QA group members have access? After all, there's nothing there that allows for personal identification, as far as I can see. Here are a few comments on the questions themselves :-) 1) change to "Where did you first hear about PEAR?" 2) change to "Where did you hear about this survey?" 5) I think that it sounds better this way: "Please select the PEAR categories you generally use packages from:" or "Please select the PEAR categories that contain the packages you generally use:" 6) "What are your favorite PEAR packages?" 7) "What are top 3 points you like about PEAR?" 8) "Please rate PEAR in the following areas:" 9) typo: Enhancing (is: Enahncing) But... maybe it would be better to simply replace "Enhancing" with "Better" 10) This question doesn't really make sense... I'd understand it as a textbox version of 9) grr... it was just deactivated, it seems :-( Anyway, I'd be happy to finish this before it finally goes online. Klaus (Btw, Toby, I'm still having trouble getting through to you... the emails still bounce and I get the message multiple days later)