Re: QA category

Joshua Eichorn wrote: > Arnaud Limbourg wrote: >> Christian Weiske wrote: >> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> >>> I asked on pear-dev which category my QA_Peardoc_Coverage tool should >>> be put in, and common sense was that a new "QA" package category >>> should be created and tools put in there. >>> >>> Perhaps PEAR alone is enough if not more QA tools come. >>> Could you please decide and add the group so I can add the package? >>> >> >> Creating a QA category might give incentive to get more tools in :) >> >> Arnaud. >> >> > A top level QA category that is specific to PEAR sounds kinda confusing, > why not do something like PEAR_QA_Peardoc_Coverage, so its clear this is > a PEAR specific QA tool not a general purpose one? You have a point. It may look like pear is providing qa tools to the public whereas the aim is to have qa tools for pear itself. Arnaud.