Re: QA category

Hello all, > Doesnt this piece of code for the first time validate > the usefulness of docbook atleast to some extend? > I did not look at the code, but I assume > he is using some of the markup of docbook in the parsing. I do think we should continue using docbook. Docbook is the standard way to document things, and I have seen and done very nice things with documents in this format. Lukas is right, having the docs as docbook helped here very much. Basically I do load the XML document via DOMXML and do some XPath queries on it. With a wiki or some other unstructured document, this would not be possible at all. Since I needed to query the package xmls and do some advanced stuff, I needed to use php here. The PHP-Gtk2 documentation coverage script is plain XSLT, without using any php or other programming language. You can do very wonderful things with docbook. So I will rename the package to PEAR_QA_Peardoc_Coverage and add a package in the PEAR category. Regards, Christian