Re: [TESTING] PEAR 1.5.2 to be released in 4 days

From: Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 03:05:25 +0000
Subject: Re: [TESTING] PEAR 1.5.2 to be released in 4 days
References: 1 2  Groups: php.pear.qa 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-4237@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Helgi Þormar Þorbjörnsson wrote: > On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 23:23:22 -0500, Gregory Beaver wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> PEAR 1.5.2 is ready to go. Please test upgrade from >> >> pear upgrade http://pear.php.net/~greg/PEAR-1.5.2.tgz >> >> then >> >> checkout pear-core/tests with >> >> cvs -d :pserver:<yourusername>@cvs.php.net:/repository co -r PEAR_1_5 >> pear-core/tests >> >> cd tests >> >> pear run-tests -rq >> >> Finally, run "pear help" > > Running 687 tests > FAIL PEAR_Registry->listPackages() v1.0[PEAR_Registry/api1_0/ > test_listPackages.phpt] > FAIL PEAR_Registry->packageInfo() v1.0[PEAR_Registry/api1_0/ > test_packageInfo.phpt] > FAIL PEAR_PackageFile_Parser_v2_Validator->validate(), phprelease tag > validation[PEAR_PackageFile_v2_Validator/test_phprelease.phpt] > FAIL upgrade-all command - real-world example from Bug #3388 > [PEAR_Command_Install/upgrade-all/test.phpt] > FAIL upgrade command, test for bug #4060 - install/upgrade of package > with an os installcondition * fails[PEAR_Command_Install/upgrade/ > test_bug4060.phpt] > FAIL install command, complex test[PEAR_Command_Install/install/ > test_complex.phpt] > FAIL install command, complex test[PEAR_Command_Install/install/ > test_complex_rest.phpt] > FAIL install command, binary package install[PEAR_Command_Install/install/ > test_extinstall.phpt] > FAIL install command, test pear install Installed#group where Installed > is already installed[PEAR_Command_Install/install/test_installgroup.phpt] > FAIL install command, simplest possible test[PEAR_Command_Install/install/ > test_simple.phpt] > wrote log to "/home/helgi/projects/pear-core-testing/pear-core/tests/run- > tests.log" > TOTAL TIME: 03:02 > 658 PASSED TESTS > 19 SKIPPED TESTS > 10 FAILED TESTS: > > a lot of regression it seems :-) > > Diffs for the failures: > http://phpfi.com/223376 > http://phpfi.com/223378 > http://phpfi.com/223380 > http://phpfi.com/223381 > http://phpfi.com/223382 > http://phpfi.com/223383 > http://phpfi.com/223384 > http://phpfi.com/223385 > http://phpfi.com/223386 > http://phpfi.com/223387 > > Some of those seem to be good old bugs that we always see when I run > those tests *sigh* but the last 5 seem to be linked in some ways > > Those above are ran as a normal user tho ;-) no wonder install is failing > hehe > > Running with higher permissions gives me this: > FAIL PEAR_Registry->listPackages() v1.0[PEAR_Registry/api1_0/ > test_listPackages.phpt] > FAIL PEAR_Registry->packageInfo() v1.0[PEAR_Registry/api1_0/ > test_packageInfo.phpt] > FAIL PEAR_PackageFile_Parser_v2_Validator->validate(), phprelease tag > validation[PEAR_PackageFile_v2_Validator/test_phprelease.phpt] > FAIL upgrade-all command - real-world example from Bug #3388 > [PEAR_Command_Install/upgrade-all/test.phpt] > wrote log to "/home/helgi/projects/pear-core-testing/pear-core/tests/run- > tests.log" > TOTAL TIME: 03:01 > 664 PASSED TESTS > 19 SKIPPED TESTS > 4 FAILED TESTS: > > a lot less of failures but still they are there. Hi Helgi, I'm willing to bet you don't get "22" when you run "pear config-get umask". The unit tests don't stuff the umask value, and probably should. The failure in your tests is we're seeing "+ chmod 664" instead of "+ chmod 644" > channel-info works, shows everything fine, tho is the version for pearweb > suppose to be missing and why does it not list the info for the us mirror > only the de one ? (not yet fully installed on us ?) if you mean "default" then yes, this is expected. I had noticed the weirdness with reporting mirror information, but forgot about it. Since this is a minor issue, I'll open a bug and put it in 1.6.0, thanks for the catch. Thanks for the tests, I appreciate the time that goes into this Greg

« previous php.pear.qa (#4237) next »