Re: [TESTING] PEAR 1.5.2 to be released in 4 days

On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 22:05:25 -0500, Gregory Beaver wrote: > Hi Helgi, > > I'm willing to bet you don't get "22" when you run "pear config-get > umask". The unit tests don't stuff the umask value, and probably > should. The failure in your tests is we're seeing "+ chmod 664" instead > of "+ chmod 644" well umask is 22 so you owe me a beer :) About the permission thing, it's 664 on the tests if that's what you are talking about, just came out that way auto, I can chmod them for you to 644 and run again if you like ? >> channel-info works, shows everything fine, tho is the version for >> pearweb suppose to be missing and why does it not list the info for the >> us mirror only the de one ? (not yet fully installed on us ?) > > if you mean "default" then yes, this is expected. I had noticed the > weirdness with reporting mirror information, but forgot about it. Since > this is a minor issue, I'll open a bug and put it in 1.6.0, thanks for > the catch. no problem, might try to check more things later today when I fully wake up > Thanks for the tests, I appreciate the time that goes into this :-) Helgi -- There are no stupid questions, only stupid people