Re: A new release of PEAR::File

From: Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 20:57:57 +0000
Subject: Re: A new release of PEAR::File
References: 1  Groups: php.pear.qa 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-qa+get-4303@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi Helgi, Helgi Þormar wrote: > I just made a release of File (finally!) where most of the work went into > File_CSV, it would be nice if people could grab the alpha package and do > pear run-tests -p File :-) I would do it, but "pear upgrade File-1.3.0a1" and "pear upgrade File-alpha" tell me: "Nothing to upgrade". This happens with PEAR 1.5.4 and even after a fresh installation of File (1.2.2). But I have run "pear run-tests" in the CVS checkout of the File package. I have a lot of failing tests (7-16) and nothing happens after test 16 failed (CTRL+C gives: "Error in my_thread_global_end(): 1 threads didn't exit"). The diff for test 10 is: 010- [4] => SD 010+ [4] => SD 011- [5] => 00298 011+ [5] => 00298 Environment: WinXP SP2, PHP 5.2.2 I can send you the result files of test 1 to 16, if you want. > The next course of action will be to get 1.3.0 out as stable and then split > File_CSV from File (with circle dep tho that way it won't break BC) that > will be a 1.4 release and of course start the doc work (full coverage) ... > Not sure which will come first. > > The idea is to just get File into a pretty much maintenance mode where no > one really has to think about the package beside fixing bugs :) > > One question tho, the class File_Util in File is a rather new class ... I > wonder if I can split it off into it's own package where only File depends > on it (BC reasons, File class still has functions calling File_Utils funcs) > and File_Utils doesn't depend back since well it doesn't use any File > features :) The split and the mentioned dependencies make sense, and shouldn't cause problems for somebody. Regards, Mark -- http://www.markwiesemann.eu

« previous php.pear.qa (#4303) next »